t.glance@att.net wrote:
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded Message: ---------------------
> From: t.glance@att.net
> To: Cougarjack@aol.com
> Subject: Re: [MV] HR 4205
> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:52:49 +0000
>
> > I don't particularly believe either Spence nor Holland in this matter. If
> that
> > is what Congress was concerned about, then why was the bill not worded as
> such?
> > There was a smokescreen here of major proportions, and we need to find out
> why.
> > Did you just fall off the turnip truck?
> >
> >
> > Mr. Holland discussed this at length. What he said was that the original
> > intent of Mr. Spence was for the government to have recourse in the event of
> > errors on the part of DRMO employees and "generators" within DOD which
> > inadvertently allow release
> >
> you mean like that big "inadvertent" release of HMMWV's? From
> what I hear lots of folks were not very happy with it.
>
> Tim
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@skylee.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@skylee.com>
> To reach a human, contact <help@skylee.com>
As far as I know, there is already a procedure in place for DRMO/DLA to
recover items or other property that was improperly given over to
"non-authorized" persons (like us civilians) and there is CERTAINLY some
Federal law governing possession of classified materials by unauthorized
persons.....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 09:32:34 PDT