----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn" <dogstar918@mediaone.net>
To: "jonathon" <jemery@execpc.com>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 09:51
Subject: Re: [MV] low sulfer diesel fuel
> Low sulphur road fuel is far lower in sulphur content than a third. As I
> recall it went from 1.5% to .05%. Some states like Massachusetts also are
> now using low sulphur No. 2 oil for heating as well per state law.
>
> Glenn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jonathon" <jemery@execpc.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles List" <mil-veh@skylee.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 00:03
> Subject: Re: [MV] low sulfer diesel fuel
>
>
> >
> > >Can you find (on the web) the study? Maybe we could mobilize the
members
> > >here and other commercial interests...
> >
> > I hope you kidding. You've got the full force (or is that farce?) of
the
> > EPA and the federal government behind this. Carrol Browners science
says
> > high sulphur fuel is bad and that's that. Never mind where she or any
of
> > her underlings learned science from. Not only is low sulphur diesel (a
> > third the surlphur of the original stuff as I recall) here to stay, but
> they
> > just anounced a few months ago that they are now going to reduce sulphur
> by
> > 97% of current levels. Buy stock in Stanadyne or buy off road diesel
and
> > only use your truck off road.
> >
> > je
> >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@skylee.com>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@skylee.com>
> > To reach a human, contact <help@skylee.com>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 09:32:35 PDT