This is not a flame, but a response to Antoine's post.
Antoine writes:
>But let the flames be off-list please, this thread, and the
>now-hopefully-defunct thread "M1 Carbine" have nothing to do with
>the restoration of Military Vehicles.
Response:
WRONG! An M1 Carbine would be carried by the occupants of certain MV's and
for MVPA judging purposes, are considered to be "vehicle accessories" and
are included in the tally of points for the vehicle being judged. This is
ofcourse, provided that the particular weapon is likely to have been carried
on such a vehicle. In effect, an M1 Carbine would be OK on a CCKW and an M16
would be OK on a HMMVW, but not vice versa.
Antoine writes:
>Postings relevant to WWII historical Military vehicles are
>already slim pickings on this list.
Response:
There are MV's other than WWII era MV's and matters concerning these
vehicles are discussed regularly. It is unfortunate, though inevitable, that
WWII vehicles have mainly settled into permanent, static-display museums and
the few that remain running are cost prohibitive to many people.
Antoine writes:
>through all this off-topic cr*p...
Response:
Again, just because you don't have a particular interest in using weapons as
vehicle accessories, doesn't mean that it should be considered off-topic.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 05 2001 - 07:58:33 PST