I picked up the same magazine. (looking for stuff for my 1972 suburban) It
was the "Best of the Best, 10 4x4s We'd Steal to Wheel" article. My most
UN-favorite quote from the M38 section was one of their reasons for wanting
it: "To prevent someone from restoring it". On the M-715 they never even
mention that it's a HMV. Oh well.
Later,
Brian
At 09:41 PM 5/13/2001 -0500, jonathon wrote:
>The latest (June 2001) issue of Peterson's 4 Wheel and Off-Road has yet
>another 10 best 4x4's article. I'm not sure that they printed them in any
>particular order but the first one listed is an M38 and a couple pages later
>is an M715. Good that MV's are getting some publicity but read that last
>two lines of the M38 caption "... this rig is great stock-restored or
>modified to your wildest dreams. If you want a builder, this is the base
>to start with."
>
>If you want a "builder" start with a common CJ3 or even a 2, why mess up
>an MV?
>
>Anyway, on page 18 they have a pic of a Land Rover 101 FC. Kind of cool
>looking. Caption said only 106 were made, is that true?
>
>later,
>
>je
>
>
>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:18:34 PDT