I recall at the time they were specifically looking for M43's. Perhaps they
didn't want to blow up any WW2 equipment and make those on the list angry?
Not that this is a WW2 list only...oops! Not that thread again!!!
I was in contact with a military vehicle rental outfit in Los Angeles at the
time and had offered my WC-54 (not to be blown up obviously).
BK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Hay" <nigel@milweb.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: [MV] Pearl Harbour- shurely shome mistakes?
Er, just a bit puzzled by the M37 ambulance (which could have been late
1960's) and the M series trucks in this film that has had almost as much
spent on it the GNP of most "emerging" nations.... and thats only after
about 5 mins of footage on TV tonite.
You'd think that whoever was the vehicle consultant would have known the
difference -even 3/4 ton WC Dodges would have been acceptable - now I
understand why its getting slated in the press.... lets hope its better than
it looks.
Nige
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:18:42 PDT