Lets see. 100$ for a takeout 230 or a thousand for a new engine? As long as
it runs good why go change it.
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Paisley <paisley@erols.com>
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] you'll be sorry...was: 715-230 engine replacement
> > A few testimonials from users doesn't prove a thing.
>
> And one testimonial from you does?
>
> > You can revise history if you like, but for something to
> > get back up to the pentagon level that quickly, something
> > must have been wrong with it.
>
> The reason it was dropped was because it was too complex/expensive to
build.
> It was cheaper to use the 232. It was simple economics, not the doom and
> gloom you seem to love to spread.
>
> Todd Paisley
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 09:34:13 PDT