For that matter, the addition of the M14 or M16 single or dual rifle
carrier in your M series vehicle could be enough. All M series vehicles
could have the kit mounted some where...Was the kit designed for universal
mounting? Does it make a difference?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claude W. Vaughn" <vaughn@totalaccess.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] demill bill trucks
> Darrell,
>
> As I read the List of Significant Military Equipment, Part 121 of DoD
"rules"
> the MB and GPW would fall under the requirements to be demilled simply
> because they could mount a weapon (post mount or perhaps even the rifle
> carrier on the windshield) or because they could carry ammunition.
>
> The SME list is very vague.
>
> WE ALL HAVE A LOT TO LOOSE... And all of America will loose a part of her
> history.
>
> Write, Call, FAX your Senator and the members of the Senate Armed Forces
> Committee.
>
> Claude.
>
>
> Darrell Shake wrote:
>
> > Someone please correct me if Im wrong on this but isnt the mb gpw family
> > regarded as truck utlity 1/4ton 4x4 . And if this is so wouldnt that
> > alone be grounds for demil under part121 . Pretty sure there is a line
> > in there about military trucks under the vehicle classification. Might
> > seem as though Im picking at small straws but if you delegate this on
> > paper down to some low level staff wont they interpret this as simply
> > letter of the law and go from that direction. Please remember that law
> > is black and white only. Darrell. GOT ALOT TO LOOSE.
> >
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:59:01 PDT