Another small victory:
Of the two senators for VA, one has already voted to
defeat the entire bill and the other responded to my
email as seen below.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Doyle, John D
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:44 AM
To: 'Steven P. Allen'
Subject: RE: [MV] S1438
This is the first time I've ever written to any of
my elected officials, so I must say I'm quite pleased
with the prompt reply.
Your suggestion sounds like a great solution to this
issue.
Thank you!
John Doyle
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven P. Allen [mailto:spallen@rolemail.ccis.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 12:27 PM
To: mil-veh@mil-veh.org
Subject: Re: [MV] S1438
This gives me an idea: might our best approach be, since it seems the
passage of this thing is a foregone conclusion, to have the term "SME"
redefined by Congress to specifically *exclude* HMVs,
re-enactor/collector/outdoor equipment, and de-milled weaponry?
Steve Allen
At 03:42 PM 10/5/01 -0500, kuhrick wrote:
>mine . . . says that tucks should not be called SME
>or what ever
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 00:36:24 PST