Not sure of the MV content here, but....
> Don't you remember
>that fight about airport security a couple of months ago?
Afraid I do...and it became ONE BIG RIP!!!
I know that before 911, "box cutters" were perfectly alright to have
on board. I am not aware of people being turned away from their flight
because they had one.
The INS is responsible for following up on questionable non-citizens,
not the bagage handlers.
>Republicans
>wanted minimum wage felons, who turn over 200% a year, guarding our
>airports instead of well paid professional force responsible directly to
>the people
Don't worry, they wouldn't be accountable.
We have already waved the high-school diploma requirement.
>and not to some corporation trying to squeeze as many pennies
>as possible so they can afford another Mercedes.
This maybe so and I'm not altogether happy about that, but I'm not a
socialist.
Then, I'm not a polititian ramming this legislation through just to make
the masses "Feel Good" with me driving off in my Mercedes assured that the
masses will vote for me,
"Feeling Good".
I still don't see were this great and wonderful bill will help the INS
or the bagage handlers.
I believe that the vast majority do try to do the best they can with the rules
that are in place at the time; and don't think that those rules
aren't a changing as we speak.
Case in point.....Senator Dingle....or is he a Rep???? That boy didn't like
being searched did he. He is oh so special. Lets change the rules....again.
Nahhhh, ain't no MV stuff here, I will go away and shutup.
Oh...my wife loves "her" CUCV! Thanks George.
There, got it in, (MV content).
Take care all,
Ted.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 06 2002 - 11:49:25 PST