From: Joe Foley (redmenaced@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Sep 22 2002 - 16:03:05 PDT
Ah, yes!
But the bigger engine will be in high gear more often
for a given load/road!
Joe
--- tom-nooneofconsequence <milveh@carr.org> wrote:
> i think this is a very simple conclusion...your
> vehicle is already
> grossly under powered and getting about as poor a
> mileage as is possible
> for the size of the engine. therefore increasing the
> load has no real
> effect as it cannot get much worse. my m-35 that now
> has 1000 miles on
> the clock, still gets 10 mpg, but now at 62 mph
> rather than at 50. but
> the engine is now 641 cu in. i'm happy..........
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to:
> <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:21:23 PDT