From: Patrick Jankowiak (eccm@swbell.net)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 20:16:49 PST
Now just look at this hilarious e-mail some pottymouth sent
me in response to my post, I was ROTFLOL!
Now, said pottymouth may be right about the model number of
the antennas. I looked them up on the mil-list site, so if I
am wrong on the cut and paste, well.. I guess the site is
wrong too. Hmm..
Check:
"http://hereford.ampr.org/cgi-bin/millist2?mode=normal&name=VRC-46"
for yourself, is it wrong? That would be a drag.
As for the other comments, text reads like pottymouth's got
a 'little bit' of puerile envy going on there, heheee..
Another reason to hide behind an anonymous remailer!
hahahahaaa!!
Well anyway, comments on the antenna numbers? are they
wrong?
====
From:
Sleeping Vayu (Vayu Anonymous Remailer)
<noreply@cyberjunkiez.de>
1:10 AM
Subject:
your stupid
To:
eccm@swbell.net
re: The RT-524 may be used with the AT-912/VRC or
AT-1729/VRC antenna
for your info it is an alpha sierra - 1729 AS-1729 not
AT-1729
and its illegal to talk to fucking truckers on your little
grc-106
for someone with an email address of eccm@swbell.net your
pretty stupid about
military radio equipmenet and legal use of it arent ya?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:24:43 PDT