From: Steve & Jeanne Keith (cckw@attbi.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 06:36:56 PST
The largest 'mass produced' Macks, NM and NO were gasoline powered.
Steve AKA Dr Deuce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Hay - MILWEB" <Nigel@milweb.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>; "Steve & Jeanne
Keith" <cckw@attbi.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] gasoline for tanks?
> Some of The WW2 Mack trucks were also dieseled I recall?
> Nige
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve & Jeanne Keith" <cckw@attbi.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] gasoline for tanks?
>
>
> > Supposedly the Navy won the battle on diesel and the Army was told to to
> use
> > gasoline. You will also recall that the early tanks had radial gasoline
> > engines. They were used because of the power to weight ratio was about
as
> > good as you could get at the time. Both Gubersion and Catapillar made a
> few
> > radial diesel aircooled engines for tanks in WW2.
> >
> > The only WW2 truck I can think of that was diesel was the early M20
> Diamond
> > T tank transporter. Even the later WW2 M26 tank transporter used an 1060
> cid
> > OHC Hall-Scott gasoline engine.
> >
> > The diesel engines back then were big and inefficient compared to today
or
> > even the gasoline engines of the day. The Corbit and Brockway trucks had
> an
> > 855 cid 6 cyl gasoline flat head engine that weighed in at about 2400#.
> >
> >
> > Steve AKA Dr Deuce
> >
> >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:24:56 PDT