From: R. A. Moir aka RAM (cyclopsram@starband.net)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 05:19:47 PST
So Billy Mays won't be hyping them for $19.95 with a second one free if you
order in the next ten seconds?? RAM
----- Original Message -----
From: <kbernste32@aol.com>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 17:25
Subject: [MV] Solargizer/Redi-Pulse Technology
>
> Well, list, excuse the engineering geek-ness, but I dug up the patents
that teach the Renew-it Technology, and the chemistry/physics is credible.
The reference USP numbers are below. I was going to build my own from
radioshack parts, but elected to fork out the money and buy one that was
hermetically sealed. Pulsetech sold me the 120V plug-into-the wall version
that they say is good for 24V, 36V, or 48V. The 12V battery circuit they use
is cheaper, but may not have the sand for driving 2 12V loads in parallel,
so the High Voltage version used on the 2 6TLs in series may be the better
bet. The challenge in the design is achieving desired waveform and
frequency. Since it pumps charge, the voltage is not a big deal.
>
> I won't gunk up the list with the circuit design or the chemistry, but the
patents have very good descriptions:
> U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,959,
> U.S. Pat. No. 5,063,341,
> U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,399
> They can be viewed at www.uspto.gov
> So I guess I believe it is not snake oil.
>
> Kerry
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:24:56 PDT