From: J Travis (dagobert@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:38:53 PST
My God, SOMEBODY actually remembers the difference still. Thank you,
Royce. After 8 dark years of the Clintonistas and historical
revisionism, I was beginning to wonder if I was imagining things with
that whole "inalienable rights" idea. But if I may, could I add "a
Constitutional Republic" to that? Just to promote the politically
incorrect notion (like my Confederate ancestors before me) that the
government is SUPPOSED to operate with limits upon its authority over
the states and the citizens.
Jay Travis
Royce C Hayes wrote:
>Please get your facts straight before you reply.
>
>Yes, he may not have won the popular vote, but since we have a republic
>and not a democracy, he was elected by the Electoral College and not the
>Supreme Court. The Supreme Court does not vote for any candidate.
>
>Royce
>===============================================
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:25:51 PDT