Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?

From: Recovry4x4@aol.com
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 05:09:01 PDT

• Next message: don gale: "Re: [MV] Multifuel block heater suggestions?"
• Previous message: Bjorn Brandstedt: "Re: [MV] M35A2 positive batt. cable"
• Next in thread: Steve & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Steve & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Ed Kirkley: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Michael J. Hill: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey Caleb, the 6.2 might be underpowered but its not bad for what it was
intended to do. I've a couple of these motors go 1/2 million miles. Just watch
that harmonic balancer. The ring shifts and you can split a crank PDQ.
kenny

• Next message: don gale: "Re: [MV] Multifuel block heater suggestions?"
• Previous message: Bjorn Brandstedt: "Re: [MV] M35A2 positive batt. cable"
• Next in thread: Steve & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Steve & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Ed Kirkley: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Maybe reply: Michael J. Hill: "Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:24:59 PDT