From: Fred Martin (mung@in-touch.net)
Date: Sun Mar 14 2004 - 05:44:13 PST
Well, Noel, thanks for the best you could do answer...I didn't know it
would be one of those extra effort things or I would have kept still.
Thanks again for going above and beyond. Fred Martin
noel shelley wrote:
> Dear Fred and List,
> Further to your question on the length of
> brake shoes , enquiries to one of the leading manufacturers has resulted in
> following answer ! The lining length will be arrived at using various design
> criteria and also the preferences of the individual designer .
> Obviously weight , speed , type of usage , operating environment , drum
> size , and lining material type will all be factors . The leading shoe in
> forward motion may be longer and also thicker since this shoe will do most
> of the braking , with factors of 3 or 4 not uncommon over the trailing shoe
> ,{single leading configuration }, meaning that a twin leading set up in
> reverse may only have 25% of it`s forward efficacy .
> Another point worthy of note in the context of braking is the principal of
> weight transfer and it`s effect on stopping the machine . Under braking the
> load on the front wheels dramatically increases resulting in the front end
> doing about 75% of the retarding , obviously if the balance of front to rear
> is not correct then a very dangerous situation is created where one end will
> lock up . In commercial or load carrying vehicles where the load varies this
> is often compensated for by using a load sensing valve on the rear .
> To sum up , there is no simple answer to the initial question !
>
> Done my best Noel
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:29:12 PDT