Re: [MV] M113's in Iraq/Stryker

From: Ryan Gill (rmgill@mindspring.com)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 09:20:49 PST


At 10:57 AM -0500 11/21/04, Steve Grammont wrote:
>
>Having said that, the Army is dissatisfied with the current remote .50
>system and is experimenting with a replacement. I'm not sure the
>proposed solution is common knowledge so I'm going to keep my yap shut :-)

The basic idea I've seen is something similar to
the Bradly turret fitted to a stryker. Though,
I'm surprised the Marder style remote turret
hasn't been proposed in a take down form. It'd
help maintain the current limitation of C130
airportability. And artificial limit that I think
hinders the development just as the British WWII
limit on Rail standards for their tanks.

-- 
--
Ryan Gill              rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
      |        |                   |         -==----      
      | O--=-  |                   |        /_8[*]°_\     
      |_/|o|_\_|       | _________ |        /_[===]_\     
      / 00DA61 \       |/---------\|     __/         \--- 
   _w/|=_[__]_= \w_    // [_]  o[]\\   _oO_\         /_O|_
  |: O(4) ==    O :|  _Oo\=======/_O_  |____\       /____|
  |---\________/---|  [__O_______W__]   |x||_\     /_||x| 
   |s|\        /|s|   |s|/BSV 575\|s|   |x|-\|     |/-|x| 
   |s|=\______/=|s|   |s|=|_____|=|s|   |x|--|_____|--|x| 
   |s|          |s|   |s|         |s|   |x|           |x| 
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:37:43 PDT