From: Ryan Gill (rmgill@mindspring.com)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 09:20:49 PST
At 10:57 AM -0500 11/21/04, Steve Grammont wrote:
>
>Having said that, the Army is dissatisfied with the current remote .50
>system and is experimenting with a replacement. I'm not sure the
>proposed solution is common knowledge so I'm going to keep my yap shut :-)
The basic idea I've seen is something similar to
the Bradly turret fitted to a stryker. Though,
I'm surprised the Marder style remote turret
hasn't been proposed in a take down form. It'd
help maintain the current limitation of C130
airportability. And artificial limit that I think
hinders the development just as the British WWII
limit on Rail standards for their tanks.
-- -- Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com ---------------------------------------------------------- | | | -==---- | O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\ |_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\ / 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \--- _w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_ |: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____| |---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x| |s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x| |s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x| |s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x| '60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3) ----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:37:43 PDT