Steve, as I have explained before............this isnt something we need to be talking about here in the open. Or should I explain what we do when?.....or how we react to??? Or???? some other scenario that you would like the enemy to know...???
We (for anyone who does reply) shouldnt be talking about things that are still happening. Or would you like me to tell you how many reporters get kicked out of the "battlefield" for letting something go. There is a "one strike" policy with the reporters. Goof up once and let out some secure info, YOUR GONE!
Please.............OPSEC. (Operational Security)
Cliff Smith SSgt USMC Iraq
From: "Steve Grammont" <islander@midmaine.com> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org> Subject: Re: [MV] What will they buy next? Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:41:27 -0500 >As they explained existing radios were not available in quintiles great >enough to supply the need, it was some over a year ago that this took place Possibly the greater need is for communicating possible threats? Convoys are speeding along at top speed quite frequently from what I gather. I'd expect it to be a lot easier to stop a 45-55mph convoy quickly and safely if the lead vehicle yelled into the radio to stop immediately instead of just pounding the brakes and hoping that everybody behind him is wide awake and eyes on the road. Anybody on this list have recent convoy experience in Iraq? If so, please contact me off list as I have a number of questions relating to
current convoy SOPs. Thanks, Steve ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>