From: Glenn Shaw (mpmutt@mtaofnj.us)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2005 - 11:16:53 PST
Hi Greg
It does. The CA law is just an attempt to outlaw in CA .50 cal rifles, semi
or bolt. The fully auto .50 already is covered. What concerns me is the
language that seems to be written to cover a ban on ALL "assault" weapons in
CA, depending on how you read it.
Glenn
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg [mailto:czechsix@cox.net]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:04 PM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: Re: [MV] BOYS - ANTI TANK RIFLE - IN .50
I thought .55 would put it into the DD category? NFA and all that good
stuff...
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darrell Ramsell" <daram@comcast.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] BOYS - ANTI TANK RIFLE - IN .50
> It is .50 or .55 cal? If it's .55 cal it's perfectly legal since the
> law states only .50 cal BMG rounds (Browning Machine Gun).
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To
reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:39:26 PDT