From: Tony Mugno (amugno@optonline.net)
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:49:32 PDT
Our EPA laws dont allow it but China doesnt have any laws regarding this
>From a Greenpeace standpoint it doesnt matter though
>
> I also understand oil from Alaska is going to China, some to Japan, China
> refines it. I suppose Japan does also. I have been told it has too much
> sulfur for U S refineries... I would like someone to explain to me what
> difference it makes if sulfur is pumped into atmosphere here or in China
> either way the atmosphere is polluted by it.
>
> E
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Tighe" <larryradio@worldnet.att.net>
> Subject: Re: [MV] Cost of petrol tax in Sweden, anyone?
>
>
>> The gas here in NJ (reg) is two dollars per gallon as of yesterday.
>>
>> The supposedly 'TRUE STORY" is that there are not enough refinery
>> facilities to meet the demand in the US, not the basic supply of oil. A
> new
>> refinery has not been built in over 30 years in the U.S. Again, the
> story
>> goes that the "tree huggers" prevent most all energy improvements...i.e.,
>> nuclear, new refinery, "clean coal".
>>
>> Further, I am told, much of the funding for the "tree hugger"
> organisations
>> comes from foreign countrys that benefit from the U.S.'s inability to
> build
>> due to tree hugger interference.
>>
>>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:42:52 PDT