From: david gudmunsen (kroctec@btopenworld.com)
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:58:20 PDT
Appreciate your (as always succinct) comments Steve,
Unfortunately the views of the informed seem to have about as much effect as
one of us peeing in the Pacific. I do so agree that the outcome of
government negligence (heads buried in sand etc) worldwide is going to
result in most dire cosequences for all of us.
Incidentally house prices in the UK reflect the limited space being made
available for house building and the fact that land ownership and hece
supply control is in the hands of a very tiny number of people.
It also means that the space to keep your MV is extremmly expensive.
Best regards from David Gudmunsen
on 4/8/05 15:18, Stephen Grammont at islander@midmaine.com wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>> As someone said however, getting from one small part of North America
>> to another takes a bloody long time. It's 13 hours from Atlanta to DC
>> at 60 mph. Its about the same from Atlanta to Miami and that's just
>> down to the next state. New England is sneaky because there's a lot of
>> small states. Go out west and you're looking at driving for hours just
>> to get out of the same county. They build the land big out there.
>
> Yes, but that doesn't mean one should be doing that 13 hour trip from
> Atlanta to DC in an SUV that gets 14mpg :-) In other words, the rate
> of consumption in the US is determined by distance and fuel efficiency.
> We can't do anything about the distance (practically speaking), but we
> COULD do something about fuel efficiency. But the consumer doesn't
> want to pay for it, industry doesn't want to do something new, and
> government doesn't want to do anything except ban guns or stick feeding
> tubes back into brain dead patients. So instead of raising the bar on
> fuel efficiency over the last 10 years, like Europe, the US has
> actually LOWERED the bar.
>
>> I would point out that the high fuel costs severely impact all those
>> things because you're reliant on heavy over the road transport for
>> moving building materials and food to the distribution and final end
>> points. This is the thing that has really soured me to the idea of
>> increased fuel taxes.
>
> The US is probably even more reliant on over the road transportation
> than Europe because of our vast distances and the lack of a viable rail
> network. When fuel prices go up it affects US commerce just as much as
> European commerce. The difference is that there is more wiggle room in
> the US because the base rate is so much lower. Which is why I think
> increased fuel taxes isn't the answer. A partnership of consumer,
> government, and industry (in that order) to figure out how to lower
> consumption is the real answer. But that would mean understanding the
> problem, and that's a lot to ask of any one of those three :-)
>
> Steve
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:42:53 PDT