Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine

From: Everette (194cbteng@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon May 02 2005 - 14:05:50 PDT

• Next message: Ed: "UH-1H Progress"
• Previous message: bruce C. Beattie: "Re: [MV] DUKWs be here"
• Maybe in reply to: Dan Maguire: "Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine"
• Next in thread: Everette: "Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

you are exatly correct - came from History Channel and applied to
automobiles

----- Original Message -----
From: "tom bauer" <milveh@verizon.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine

> you must mean production engine for automobiles........ as this is a
> rather wimpy engine as large engines go.
> tom
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>

• Next message: Ed: "UH-1H Progress"
• Previous message: bruce C. Beattie: "Re: [MV] DUKWs be here"
• Maybe in reply to: Dan Maguire: "Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine"
• Next in thread: Everette: "Re: [MV] 824.8 cubic inch engine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:43:23 PDT