Re: Re: [MV] Bridge plate question

From: rcakitty@verizon.net
Date: Sat May 28 2005 - 12:19:44 PDT

• Next message: Jim Webster: "Re: [MV] Interesting trucks on Gov liquidation...."
• Previous message: Larry Tighe: "Re: [MV] '74 M151A2 for sale"
• Maybe in reply to: Sarge: "Re: [MV] Bridge plate question"
• Next in thread: Art Swain (MTA): "RE: [MV] Bridge plate question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well, I stand corrected! (from my previous post on this subject) Robert Anderson From: Ken Boge <ken@clovermachine.com>
>Date: Sat May 28 12:35:20 CDT 2005
>To: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>Subject: Re: [MV] Bridge plate question

>A quote from TB 746-93-1 (Oct 1964):
>
>"If the vehicle is to be used in combination, position the retaining plate
>so that the red C on one side of the plate will be visible. If the vehicle
>is to be used singly, position the retaining plate so that the red C will
>not be visible."
>
>Ken
>
>
>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>

• Next message: Jim Webster: "Re: [MV] Interesting trucks on Gov liquidation...."
• Previous message: Larry Tighe: "Re: [MV] '74 M151A2 for sale"
• Maybe in reply to: Sarge: "Re: [MV] Bridge plate question"
• Next in thread: Art Swain (MTA): "RE: [MV] Bridge plate question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 22:42:56 PDT