From: flyn3nvt@adelphia.net
Date: Mon Jun 06 2005 - 13:58:50 PDT
i am not againsed ww2 vehicles either. infact one day i would like to own a half-track and try it out. But for now I am to busy working on my Vietnam Collection. i will look into getting back into the MVPA. So the supply line hasent gotten any better over the yrs????? I was one of the ones that watched the pages disapear.
---- chance wolf <chance_wolf@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JEFF HAIN-MATSON" <flmv@flmv.net>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [MV] MVPA - interesting reading on the G503 list
>
>
> > That would be the WWII jeep collectors club mentality, I have ranted
> > about it in the past here, look at the archives!!
> >
> > > additude the group showed me. I cant imagine the EAA supporting the
> > P-51 only and not the little >guys. I know that I am not the only one
> > that has felt that way. Maybe the member that is not >getting
> > re-elected is M-series modivated??
>
> Very interesting reading over there - all six pages of it - and not the good
> kind.
>
> Sweeping things under the rug in avoidance of full-disclosure is always the
> best way of turning something relatively small into something
> Club-destroying. It all seems very unnecessary. If such actions were taken
> with the Greater Interests of the Club at heart - then the reasoning should
> be trotted out for the membership to see if everyone's definition of
> "Greater Interests" coincides with that of the Board's. Anything less will
> pour gas on a fire which should never have been lit to begin with.
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 22:47:28 PDT