From: MV (MV@dc9.tzo.com)
Date: Wed Aug 10 2005 - 21:39:57 PDT
Apparently some people with power disagree with you and I Arthur. I
suspect it has a lot to do with cheap labor.
Even GWB, as much as he rants about national security is definitely
against locking down the borders and rooting out the illegals. Seems
like a total contradiction to me. Apparently national security is a
good idea until it inhibits an influx of cheap, illegal labor, then it's
not such a great idea.
Hey but at least no one will get poked with a nail file while on an
airplane! Meanwhile the hold is full of unchecked, and unscanned
container of cargo.
What a load of BS.
Dave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
m35products wrote:
> WHAT WE OUGHT TO DO IS CLOSE THE DAMNED BORDERS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
>
> THERE ARE 1,000,000 PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES THIS EVENING WHO ARE
> UNACCOUNTED FOR.
>
> THAT'S ONE MILLION PERSONS WITHOUT PAPERS, OR EXPIRED PAPERS.
>
> IF ONE OF THEM IS A TERRORIST, THAT'S ONE TOO MANY.
>
> LET'S CLOSE THE BORDERS AND KEEP THEM CLOSED, USING THE BEST MP'S, AND MV'S
> WE HAVE.
>
> APB, IMMIGRANT.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Employee at MILVEHCO" <milveh@dslextreme.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] OT - Political Correctness Amuck
>
>
>
>>John, until they start coming at us with different profile types, logic
>>says we ought to go with what we know for sure using the last 4 decades of
>>(terrorist) acts to develope the profile. Rather than to lump everyone
>>into the "possible" terrorist category with the purely random AP searches,
>>we ought to do logical, scientific screening using known terrorists
>>profiles until such time the situation changes or until we have the luxury
>>of unlimited resources. But, for now, we have to focus what we have and
>>use it where it will likely produce the most results. That's threat
>>assessment (profiling) and to me thats just common sense.
>>
>>Jack
>>
>>
>>J. Forster
>>
>>>You missed the point of my earlier post.
>>>
>>>The most dedicated of the Jihadis (and likely the MOST dangerous) are
>>>learning
>>>to defeat the profiles established for them by doing things apparently
>>>inconsistent with being a devout Muslim, according to the TV reports
>
> about
>
>>>them
>>>on PBS 'Now' (??).. .
>>>
>>>-John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Larry Tighe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Be it "Statistical Probablility" or "Profiling" it's gotta be done.
>
> The
>
>>>>test below answers the obvious. I hope
>>>>this can end the OT discussion of "self-destructive behaviour" called
>>>>PC.
>>>>
>>>>HISTORY TEST [snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>>>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
>
> <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>
>>>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>>>
>>
>>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 23:25:27 PDT