From: JTravis (dagobert@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Sep 14 2005 - 13:02:05 PDT
Oh, I don't know- it seems fitting, somehow. An unconstitutional pledge
to a government that has almost completely abandoned any resemblance to
a Constitutional Republic sounds about right. If they won't have us
recite the pledge, how about WE teach our kids to all start whistling
Dixie instead?!?
Larry Tighe wrote:
> I seem to remember "under God" was added in the '50's by Eisenhower.
> It's not original and does kinda shove religion into what was not
> before. No court can prevent folks from adding what they want on a
> private/personal level....I like that.
>
> lar
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron" <rojoha@adelphia.net>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:28 PM
> Subject: [MV] Who is making these decisions?
>
>
>> A Federal Judge has ruled that the recitation of the Pledge of
>> Allegiance in schools is unconstitutional because it uses the phrase
>> 'Under God', per a FOX News headline alert. Ruling occurred about 30
>> minutes ago.
>> Lock and load, prepare to move out, ROE: Terminate with extreme
>> prejudice....
>>
>>
>> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
>> <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 23:27:06 PDT