From: Wayne Harris (papercu@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:32:44 PST
I was thinking RPM had more to do with the cycles than kw. The sites I
>From: Arthur Bloom <m35prod@optonline.net>
looked at had 1500 rpm = 50 cycle, 1800 rpm = 60 cycles. I run my M816 at
1300 rpm for the crane (small loads) anything more seems awful loud. I
don't think even if I turned the TV up to max I could hear it over the
engine. Wayne
>To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>Subject: Re: [MV] M35, what next for longer bed?
>Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:24:25 -0500
>
>Yes, I just did the calculations. 1 kilowatt = 1.3 hp No big deal for a
>multi-fuel.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "MV" <MV@dc9.tzo.com>
>To: "Arthur Bloom" <m35prod@optonline.net>
>Cc: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:45 AM
>Subject: Re: [MV] M35, what next for longer bed?
>
>
>| Yes, but not much more. One or two clicks on the throttle control
>| should do it.
>|
>| I've got a 55 hp Hercules farm engine I use to power a 10 KW generator
>| when the lights go out. It loafs along at 1200 rpm and has power to
>| spare running the 10 KW generator at capacity. It burns 2 gph on gas.
>| A big multifuel should not have to break 1000 rpm to get a lot more than
>| 10 KW.
>|
>| Dave
>|
>| Arthur Bloom wrote:
>| > It's gonna need to do more than idle to make 10 kW.
>| >
>| > apb
>| >
>| > ----- Original Message -----
>| > From: "MV" <MV@dc9.tzo.com>
>| > To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>| > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:33 AM
>| > Subject: Re: [MV] M35, what next for longer bed?
>| >
>| >
>| > |
>| > | Instead of going with a longer bed to fit a diesel generator in
>front,
>| > | why not go with a PTO driven generator and just run the truck engine
>| > | when you need the power. 10-15 KW generators with low speed 540 rpm
>| > | inputs are commonly used as PTO devices from farm tractors. You
>could
>| > | mount the generator underneath the truck, so it would be out of view
>and
>| > | put the switchgear up above. From previous posts I believe that the
>| > | multifuel engines draw about 1 gph when idling.
>| > |
>| > | Anyway, this is just an idea that came to mind.
>| > |
>| > | Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:40:54 PDT