Military Vehicles, April 1997,: Re: [MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks

Re: [MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks

Michael G. Howell (michael@tsixroads.com)
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:40:22 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: ETIMOTHY1@aol.com: "[MV] M-SERIES VENT LINES"
Previous message: Edward Greeley: "Re: [MV] Heads up!"
Maybe in reply to: TPloughe@aol.com: "[MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks"
Next in thread: Scott Family: "Re: [MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks"

I didn't mean to discourage anyone from collecting and restoring
M135/211's and I certainly don't think they are ugly. What I meant was
that they are less sought after than other trucks. Therefore in the
supply vs demand equation that capitalism is based on $1900 in my
opinion is too much for 3 trucks that don't run. That was, after all,
the original question. What did the rest of you think about price?

Michael Howell
Tishomingo, Mississippi
M135/211
M37
M725

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

Next message: ETIMOTHY1@aol.com: "[MV] M-SERIES VENT LINES"
Previous message: Edward Greeley: "Re: [MV] Heads up!"
Maybe in reply to: TPloughe@aol.com: "[MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks"
Next in thread: Scott Family: "Re: [MV] 2&1/2 ton trucks"