Military Vehicles, May 1997,: Re: [MV] 24V vs 12V

Re: [MV] 24V vs 12V

RKiser8375@aol.com
Sat, 3 May 1997 23:48:02 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Emery: "Re: [MV] Mule parts needed"
Previous message: C3TXA1@aol.com: "Re: [MV] Voltage reduction"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Bristol: "[MV] 24V vs 12V"

I believe it is better to leave it 24v for resale value. Most people that
want to buy M37's are collectors, and will pay more if it is original. It's
the same reason you shouldn't put a V8 engine in it. Yeah, it needs more
power, but the resale value goes down when you modify it.

Rob
rkiser8375@aol.com
< ') ) ) >><
< ' ) ) ) >><
< ' ) ) ) >><
< ' ) ) ) >>< < ' ) ) ) >><

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

Next message: John Emery: "Re: [MV] Mule parts needed"
Previous message: C3TXA1@aol.com: "Re: [MV] Voltage reduction"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Bristol: "[MV] 24V vs 12V"