Military-Vehicles: Re: [MV] Repro Jeep Bodies expanded

Re: [MV] Repro Jeep Bodies expanded

GIjeeps@aol.com
Sat, 26 Jul 1997 23:37:22 -0400 (EDT)

In a message dated 97-07-26 11:29:54 EDT, RobRatt@aol.com writes:

<< If a jeep with a repro body on it can no longer be called a Jeep, than is
my
1943 WC-51 (reproduction wiring harness, electric fuel pump, oxy/propane
machine guns, Cadillac ambulance siren (with military data plate), new brake
pads, reproduction canvas, reproduction tires, new gas & lubricants, ad
nauseum) a refurbished WC or a restored WC?

Also, I have worked on some half-tracks. Usually, they are found with the
rear armor cut off. Lacking the facilities to fabricate new armor, we
usually welded plate steel to the rear and finished it as original. BTW, I
couldn't find original half-track headlamps when I needed them, so I used
off-road headlamp housings and body putty! I guess that is going to choke
some of the purists up! Also, several *purists* didn't believe me when I
told them what the original looked like until I brought out the photos.

Having a pure vehicle is nice if you are planning to show it only. I like
to
have fun with my vehicles. I also use them in living history displays to
teach people history. They seem to get a better grasp on things when they
can feel, smell, hear, touch, see, and taste it, rather than just read about
it. You'd be surprised at how many people I have *won* over to keeping
history alive just by showing up with a vehicle. >>
I'll not bother to answer in detail. If you speak and read the English
language you cannot possibly have missed my point by so wide a margin as this
posting suggests.
I will assume that it has reached the point of people trying to out-stubborn
each other and so I will digress from the conversation at this point.

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.