Inappropriate is when someone refers to their Suzuki Samari as a jeep.
Jim Rice
'43 GPW s/n 99560
'52 M38
'51 M100 1/4 Ton trailer
Formerly owner of '54 M38A1
SBJohnston@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi Mil-Veh listers:
>
> In the last couple months I have run into two separate persons interested in
> military vehicles who have tried to tell me that the term "jeep" only
> applies to the MB's and GPW's of WWII. Seemed silly to me, particularly
> since "Jeep" is stamped into the front of the toolbox on my '51 M38.
>
> This evening I started reading "The All-American Wonder" ('93 edition) and
> was surprised to see a very similar opinion expressed in print. Author
> Cowdery writes: "the word jeep is used in the generic sense to describe all
> Bantam, WIllys, and Ford 1/4-ton 4x4 trucks produced for military use between
> 1940 and 1945. To use the word jeep to describe anything else is inaccurate"
>
> He goes on to point out the capital-J name "Jeep" applies only to the
> commercial/civilian vehicles produced by Willys, Kaiser, AMC, and Chrysler.
>
> On the next page, though, Cowdery describes the 1952 Museum of Modern Art
> Automotive Design exhibit and he refers to their 4x4 1/4-ton example as a
> "1951 military jeep." Hmmmm....
>
> I'm interested in this distinction... Does anyone know of any reasonable
> basis for the position that the only true "jeeps" are WW-II era models? Or
> is it, as I suspect, merely a somewhat snobbish opinion exhibited by a few
> WWII-vintage jeep enthusiasts?
>
> Steve Johnston
>
> sbjohnston@aol.com
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.
===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.