Re: [MV] MV's and Non-directional snow

Brent Boxall (bboxall@chattanooga.net)
Sat, 17 Jan 1998 18:20:04 -0500

Here in Northwest Georgia we generally get light snow (1-4") and usually ice
mixed in and we have little plowing and less salting. My M35A2 w/NDT's
seems to go great in the snow. Stopping is best accomplished with gearing
and front axle must be engaged when climbing icy hills. Also, idle speed
works best on the steep icy hills.

Alan Bowes wrote:

> bleffler@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone out there have any good stories, or helpful hints about
> > driving MV's with issue non-directional tires on snow and icy roads?
> > I have given up until I locate some tire chains. You haven't
> > experienced life fully until you dig a deuce and a half out of
> > the snow in the dark at 20 degrees. I amazes me that the thing
> > is so immobile in icy conditions. What am I doing wrong?
>
> ****************
>
> After investigating alternative tires for my current M37 project, I've
> opted to stay with the original NDT tread. I have a couple of other 4x4s
> that I can use when the roads are icy.
>
> Here in Salt Lake, it snows frequently during the winter (averaging
> maybe once per week), and we live on a steep hill overlooking the
> valley. We get more snow up here than down in the lower portion of the
> valley and the steep roads in this section of town can become very
> treacherous until the plows and salt trucks arrive. I also travel
> frequently through the surrounding mountains for both business and
> recreational purposes, and there is plenty of white stuff up there (most
> of the 2002 Winter Olympic Game venues will be within about 30-45
> minutes' drive from our home).
>
> I've owned two other vehicles with military NDT tires (MB and GPW), and
> I've actually had pretty good luck with the NDTs, except on VERY
> hard-packed snow and ice, in which case they are noticeably slicker than
> a good radial snow tire. In softer, deeper snow, NDTs seem to work
> admirably. They also work well on snow-packed roads in very cold
> conditions (cold air and cold ground), in which case the snow tends to
> remain granular for a longer period of time and be re-formed by your
> tires as you drive over it, even though others have driven over it
> before. Naturally, conditions will vary considerably.
>
> I want to emphasize that on ice, all tires are pretty slippery, unless
> they're studded. A tire with lots of fine siping will generally do a
> little better on ice, due to its many tiny gripping edges. Radials will
> be somewhat better than bias-ply tires on an icy surface. Some of the
> newer silica-impregnated tread compounds may perform a little better on
> ice, not so much because of the edges of the crystals themselves, but
> because it tends to make for a more stable tread compound that is
> perhaps a bit stiffer, giving the edges of the tread a somewhat better
> bite. I suspect that the silica also helps keep the rubber from
> softening too much at high temperatures (not applicable in this case).
>
> Keep in mind that radials are NOT necessarily better under all
> conditions. When driving in extremely rugged terrain, such as the trails
> in Utah's canyon country, non-belted bias-ply tires are often the tire
> of choice because of their ability to conform to the rocks, ruts, and
> convolutions, wrapping themselves around these obstacles rather than
> concentrating the weight on smaller areas, such as the tops of pointed
> rocks, which is what happens with belted tires under those conditions.
> When non-belted bias-ply tires are used with low pressure, this ability
> is magnified. Also, radial sidewalls tend to be more vulnerable to
> damage, partly due to the lack of criss-cross plies, and partly because
> the sidewalls hang farther out over obstacles than the sidewalls of a
> bias-ply tire. The Dick Cepek tire company and several others make
> non-belted bias-ply tires for off-road use and they charge a premium
> price for these guys.
>
> I recently managed (unintentionally) to poke a small tree root right
> through the side of a Michelin tire on my pickup truck. It went through
> the sidewall like a hot knife through butter. I didn't even feel a bump
> when I drove over it at about three MPH.
>
> One approach would be to carry a set of chains with you and put them on
> only when needed. The lighter-weight cable-type chains may not last as
> long as the link-type chains, but they aren't as rough riding, they
> install quickly, and they work OK on ice. Neither type is good for
> high-speed driving.
>
> If you don't mind paying big bucks, Michelin makes some military-type
> radials (XCL XZL XL etc.) that have steel-ply sidewalls as well as steel
> belts under the tread. These aren't manufactured in the US, but they are
> available. In the 9.00R-16 size they run between 325 and 345 dollars per
> tire in the US (Gordon McMillan says they're even more expensive in
> Scotland). Don't know about the 20-inch sizes.
>
> I think it boils down to what kind of driving you'll be doing and how
> often the tires would be a disadvantage to you as opposed to
> advantageous. If authenticiy is important, stay with the original
> pattern and keep a set of chains handy.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alan
> (Salt Lake City, Utah)
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.