Re: Re[2]: [MV] Re: SCUD missle seizure in Calif., Part 1

Thomas Durkin (tdurkin@earthlink.net)
Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:51:49 -0500

I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it.

----------
> From: JRONEY@elotouch.com
> To: krbaylor@ix.netcom.com; mil-veh@skylee.com; GIjeeps@aol.com
> Subject: Re[2]: [MV] Re: SCUD missle seizure in Calif., Part 1
> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 1998 12:21 PM
>
> I am fascinated by the incredible lack of integrity displayed by
those
> in this group who would condemn the importation of a SCUD carrier,
yet
> defend and promote the trade of other military vehicles.
>
> Discounting all arguements concerning security, (which are invalid)
> and about trusting yourself and not your neighbor (which is absurd),

> it is vitally important to remember that no society had ever existed

> in a free state until the citizens of that country possessed
weapons.
> It is the continued maintenance of THAT arsenal which keeps us free,

> and serves as a model to liberate others.
>
> Please remember: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to
secure
> a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall
not
> be infringed." no distinction between small arms, light machine
guns,
> armoured vehicles, tanks, anti-aircraft guns, SCUDS, or
thermo-nuclear
> devices. The whole premise is that YOU are responsible for
protecting
> US. (...and I thank you for it!) You should also remember that in
> 1930, you could by a full-auto Thompson for $200. over the counter.

>
> To keep things in perspective, the worst mass-murders in US history
> were from 1:fertilizer, and 2:gasoline. (no conclusive evidence on
> TWA 800, but it wasn't a SCUD)
>
> NOW, back on topic...Does anybody know more about the VEHICLE that
> carries that SCUD? Who makes it? What is its designation? How is
it
> powered? Is it a converted firetruck? How fast will it go? Is it
> all wheel drive? Does it have air conditioning? Most importantly,
> HOW CAN I GET ONE???
>
> James Roney
> JRoney@Elotouch.com
> (military vehicle enthusiast)
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: Re: [MV] Re: SCUD missle seizure in Calif., Part 1
> Author: GIjeeps@aol.com at internet
> Date: 9/30/98 11:15 AM
>
>
> In a message dated 98-09-30 02:02:15 EDT, krbaylor@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> << He noted that terrorists or rogue states could use
> > > > such collectors to acquire missiles illegally. >>
> Yikes! We are all missle dealers now it seems. Should I change my profile
to
> read collector of jeeps, staff cars, trucks, tanks and the odd
> intercontinental ballistic missle here and there?
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.