Re: [MV] Jim Gilmore

WILAX@aol.com
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 11:54:08 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: LEEnCALIF@aol.com: "[MV] Elections and candidates-MVPA"
Previous message: Tom Bauer: "Re: [MV] Silicone brake fluid"
Maybe in reply to: Carl Konefsky: "[MV] Jim Gilmore"
Next in thread: DBaumanjr@aol.com: "Re: [MV] Jim Gilmore"

In amateur radio, the ARRL is against, yes they lobby against, antique AM
operation. I only operate CW and AM and the ARRL can only recognize ssb and
digital modes. So whats the point you made? The ARRL is a niche lobbying
and technical (with limited focus) group. Therefore I am not a member of
ARRL. Should MVPA waste our money with lawyers and lobbiests? It sounds
like the bias here is yes, we should get away from the mission of helping
restorers preserve/restore vehicles and change to being a lobbying group.
Well, as I stated before, once lawyers and lawsuits got involved in the MVCC
it was the end of that club.

Tom
MVPA 4317

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

Next message: LEEnCALIF@aol.com: "[MV] Elections and candidates-MVPA"
Previous message: Tom Bauer: "Re: [MV] Silicone brake fluid"
Maybe in reply to: Carl Konefsky: "[MV] Jim Gilmore"
Next in thread: DBaumanjr@aol.com: "Re: [MV] Jim Gilmore"