Re: [MV] A fixed MVPA Election?

Chuck Chriss (cchriss@IX.NETCOM.COM)
Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:00:52 -0700

This is very serious. Jim's account of the MVPA nominations process is entirely
inappropriate for an organization which is supposed to be for the benefit of its
membership. Since there are many MVPA members on mil-veh, this deserves a detailed
response right here on the mil-veh list.

By copy of this email, I am asking MVPA to provide a public response via this email list.
I think it will injure the reputation of MVPA to fail to respond or to delay a response.

Chuck Chriss
MVPA #547C

chuck@olive-drab.com

-----Original Message-----
From: jim gilmore <jgilmore@oeonline.com>
To: mil-veh@skylee.com <mil-veh@skylee.com>
Date: Saturday, July 10, 1999 4:34 PM
Subject: [MV] A fixed MVPA Election?

>Dear List (and MVPA) members;
>
> I have read the kind words spoken about me and I am humbled by them. I
>feel that it is time to put out the story of the latest attempt by the MVPA
>Board to influence the election by manipulating the nomination procedures.
>Here is the story so far...........
>
> I ran for the board of Directors in the last election and after the
>election
>was over I found that there were some "irregularities" shall we say, in the
>MVPA election process. I won't go into them here as most of you who have read
>the ad I ran in Military Vehicles last time already know what transpired. I
>was
>forced to "go to the membership" with my findings when the board did not
>appear
>to want to remedy the questionable past election process. This action on my
>part was a major reason the MVPA board revised the election rules so that no
>one person or group could unduly influence the outcome of the election (a
>fair,
>honest election was the goal) as in the past. At least that's what I
>thought
>at the time.
> This year I again sent my nomination in to the MVPA National Office. I
>was later called by the Nominating Committee chairman (and MVPA VP) Kenton
>Tucker to do a "phone interview to check my qualifications to run for the
>board". After a lengthy conversation with many questions, Mr Tucker stated he
>was satisfied that I had met all the six qualifications as outlined in the
>Bylaws. My qualifications are listed at the end of this letter. This was the
>last I heard from the committee until a friend called me right after the
>Convention to tell me that, at the Board meeting, the Committee had
>rejected my
>nomination "for cause".
> The next day I picked up a registered letter from the MVPA Vice President
>which stated the following:
>
>" After extensive review and discussion of your credentials, I regret to
>inform
>you that the committee did not recommend to the board of directors that you be
>placed on the slate of nominees. I can assure you that your resume and
>interview received a thorough professional review."
> No reason or "cause" was given! Why could I run in the last election
>and
>not this one?
>
> I immediately tried to contact the Vice president by phone. After
>several days, he did contact me and I asked him to explain the action of the
>committee and as to exactly what the reason or "cause" was. He stated that
>there was NO SPECIFIC REASON, just that the Committee had voted to reject my
>nomination. When pressed by me for an answer he mentioned that while I was
>qualified "the ad had something to do with the other committee members
>negative
>votes".
> Now, thoroughly confused, I contacted two other Board Members who I
>consider (and still do) good friends and asked them what they knew about this
>matter. They both had asked the Committee at the board meeting for a reason
>why
>I was to be excluded from the election. NO REASON WAS GIVEN TO THEM! One in
>fact then voted not to approve the "slate of Candidates" if I was not on it
>and
>the other said "We should let the voters decide". One of the two stated to me
>that the Nominating Committee had met with the MVPA's lawyers and in his
>opinion the other board members "were teaching me a lesson because I rocked
>the
>boat!".
>
> It then became obvious to me what was going on. The Nominating Committee
>must be appointed by the MVPA President, the board then approves them with
>the
>Vice President as the chairman as per the Bylaws. Let's look at who this
>committee's members are; Jerry Cleveland, Reg Hodgson, Lou Moore and Kenton
>Tucker. The first three are Board members that are appointed, NOT elected to
>the board. THEY CANNOT BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE! This leaves them free to do as
>they please and not worry about repercussions from the members. If they don't
>recommend a person, he can't run (or so they think). It makes a nice neat
>way
>to keep ANYONE they dislike out of the election and the rest of the board can
>sit back and say "it was the Nominating committee that wouldn't let him run,
>not us".
> What can the members do about it if it angers them?
>
> NOTHING !!! YOU CAN'T VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE !
>
> Sweet deal
>right? It now seems you will have to be a friend of the Committee (and the
>Board)
>to be allowed to run for office. They now have another way to influence the
>elections by controlling what members are "recommended" (allowed) to run for
>the Board. However, there is nothing in the MVPA Bylaws that says a candidate
>MUST be "recommended" to be able to run or be put on the ballot, just that he
>must pass the six qualifications.
>
> On July 5th I faxed the MVPA Nominating Committee the following
>question;
>
> "I ask the Committee to show just cause for their failure to present my
>nomination to the Board of Directors."
>
> A simple question right? They should have the reason right now since
>they
>rejected my nomination "for cause" before June 3,1999 ! Well, as of today,
>July 11th, I have not received an answer to this simple question.
>
> On July 5th I also faxed the Board of Directors (via MVPA HQ) the
>following question;
>
> "As a nominee who possesses all the qualifications set forth in Sec.
>4.3 of the MVPA Bylaws I ask the Board of Directors to show just cause why my
>name is to be excluded from the slate of suitable candidates."
>
> Another simple question. So far I have not received a response. I see
>by a
>posting on this list from Katie Ferencz that the MVPA president has stated to
>her (by phone) that a letter will be drafted and sent to me with the reason
>within a week. Why wait a week when they should have already had the reason
>when I was "rejected with cause" back in the beginning of June? The MVPA has
>my phone and fax numbers and my e-mail address so it would be a simple
>thing to
>just contact me directly.
>
> This is the story so far. I am not looking to harm the club, create
>discontent or to start legal action unless I am forced to.
>
> I just wanted my chance to run in a fair and honest election.
>
>The membership should know if there is an attempt to take away their right to
>choose who will be elected to MVPA office. The Board of Directors should not
>use the MVPA election as their personal tool to punish members who disagree
>with them.
>
> Thanks for taking to time to read this,
>
> Jim Gilmore
>
>Qualifications for requirements for Board or Directors
> James Gilmore MVPA #5843
>
>(I) I have been a MVPA member for 15 years
>(II) I have attended three out of the last four conventions and regularly
>attend most of the rallies in the East and Midwest. I have
>also attended the 45th, 50th, and 55th MVPA Normandy Tours.
>(III) I am a founder of the 1st Michigan, Arsenal of Democracy Chapter MVPA
>and have served as Newsletter Editor, Vice President, and President of this
>chapter. I am one of the top recruiters of new MVPA members in the world.
>I am
>also acknowledged by the Ford Motor Company as the leading historian on Ford
>built military vehicles. I am an accredited researcher in both the National
>Archives and the Henry Ford Museum. Since 1980, I have been collecting,
>restoring and using military vehicles and currently own over 15 military
>vehicles.
>(IV) I am employed as a pressman in the Newsprint Department of the Detroit
>Newspapers and have been so for the past 28 years. I also hold a Federal
>Firearms license with an endorsement for the manufacture of automatic weapons.
>(V) I have never been convicted of a felony or other serious crime.
>(VI) I have never been removed from the MVPA Board of Directors.
>
>
> Jim
>----------------------------------------------------------
>"Considered too dangerous to be allowed to run for the MVPA board"
>----------------------------------------------------------
>Jim Gilmore MVPA # 5843
>2565 Wiethoff Inkster, Mi. 48141
>313-561-8826 Phone
>313-730-1652 Fax
>jgilmore@oeonline.com
>
>ÿ
>To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
>UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.
>

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.