[MV] MVPA Election

Carl Konefsky (cameraman@niia.net)
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 06:43:17 -0500

List
I have seen all the commets on this list as to this election both the
postive and negtive (negitive being against Jim Gilmore).Thw bottom
line is for the MVPA to reinsate Jim's name to the ballot and let the
membership decide if he is suitable to be in office.(Heck we have in
Washington that arn't suitable to be there)
Some of the coments make sense one was Laywer double talk but in all it
was good thanking the fact we have this way of getting things out and
the way people feel.
Yes the MVPA is a good organisation but it has to allow for new and
different people to be on the board.Maybe a new by law that allows only
2 terms for anyone and a nominating commitee that only oversees the
election and does not have the power to reject anyone only if they are
of leeser carecter then guidlines set them to be.
Well we should continure this on the chat room of my Web Site on Tuesday
this week 8pm Central time
http://www.qsl.net/w9tad/index.htm
Thanks for listing and I just belive in fairness and the American that
all are equal
Carl

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.