INDUSTELE@aol.com wrote:
>
> Gentlemen, I have an ethical question, and I would like a general opinion as
> to which way to proceed.
>
> I have "reverse engineered" the much sought after MT-250 radio mount for the
> WWII jeep (and other vehicles). I have borrowed one from a museum and am in
> the process of making a prototype of my design. The prototype is at the
> laser cutters now and expected out on Thursday. I plan to bend and form it
> to make sure it matches the original. I've measured and re-measured and
> re-measured this thing until it's accurate to 0.0001 inches and is actually
> better than the original one I've had to copy (it's 1/8" out of square).
>
> THE ETHICAL QUESTION: I'm torn between making a 100% exact replica, or making
> a 98% accurate copy. My reasoning behind this is that since these things are
> so scarce, some crook may try to pass them off as original if I made it 100%
> exact. I can duplicate the original nameplate and probably the original
> rubber parts, and make it 100%; or I can change the nameplate and put a
> current date stamped in it and use the original rubber parts and make it 99%
> or I can change both the nameplate and the rubber parts and make it 98%
> accurate; or the rubber and not the nameplate, etc... What's your thinking
> on this? Would you make them 100% and sell them as reproductions and hope
> for the best or what?? I'd really like to know your opinion on this.
>
> Thanks for your input. Tom Campbell - Birmingham, Alabama USA
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.
===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.