*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
List,
If this was a gun thing, the NRA legal folks would be all over it.
What about the MVPA?
Has anyone told them (in writing) about this case? What was their
reply?
Not to start MVPA bashing, but it seems the organization should take
up this gauntlet (and yes, even some costs) and * DO SOMETHING*.
Are there any lawyers in the MVPA that would do this pro bono (I think
that is the term)? Could the MVPA try to come up with some lawyers to
do a "Friend of the court" advisory brief?
If the cammo argument was sound, then any white car hit in a snowstorm
would be at fault, the Car makers for making cars with low viz colors
like "Black" and hit at night, Brown or tan and hit in CA, or just
about anything and hit at dusk or dawn.
It also sounds like the owner had a pretty lame lawyer if they
couldn't present some of these counter arguments.
Hell, just bring in woodland cammo jacket and then an urban pattern
jacket and show that a woodland cammo is unacceptable as cammo in an
urban environment..."see! the government has gone to the expense to
use something pretty radically different. They consider the woodland
scheme so unusuable for urban use that they created the
grey/white/black urban pattern!"
Geeeeeez!
-Jim Burrill
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@uller.skylee.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@uller.skylee.com>
Send administrative queries to <mil-veh-request@uller.skylee.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 05 2000 - 22:42:38 PST