Re: [MV] Applicable to an M35????

From: Brandon (c322348@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 21:06:38 PDT


I think that they are suggesting that any significant military equipment
(SME) vehicle that has not been demilitarized should have been per existing
laws at that time, and therefore it would also be illegal to re-militarize
them at a future date (since it would again become SME). This also captures
M151's that should have been demilled, but somehow escaped such a fate
(????).

An M35 does not require demilitarization, so you should be OK. My HMMWV is
clearly at risk.

And since when does the constitution come into play with modern US
politics??????

BK
----- Original Message -----

Hello to the group,
I am new to this group and am subscribing due to an interest in buying a
M35A2 some time in the future. Or at least I was until all this talk of a
new bill being passed in the US potentially implying the need to
re-demilitarize such a vehicle.
Now obviously I want to buy a M35A2 as part of the essential hardware needed
when plotting to take over the world. Well in amongst all the opinions and
commentary I thought I'd throw this extra on in for good measure.
Take a quick look at section 9 of the US Constitution.
The Constitution of the United States
Section 9 - Limits on Congress
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now
existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the
Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax
or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for
each Person.
The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless
when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

I am certainly no expert (more of a devils Advocate) but No Bill of
attainder or EX POST FACTO LAW shall be passed! I am sure that the bill
being discussed certainly has retroactive implications (ex post Facto). So
could it not be argued that such a law if passed would be unconstitutional?
Or is that me just trying to stretch things too far ??

_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 09:32:23 PDT