From: IHC53 (IHC53@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:29:24 PST
Another post that goes in the delete file.
*MANDATORY MV CONTENT*
A few weeks ago my MUTT wouldn't start. Actually it wouldn't
even pretend to start, it was like it wasn't getting any juice to the
starter. Well I pulled the starter and had it tested. It tested
OK, but when I put it back in the ol' girl fired right up. Im
still scratching my head on that one, but it seems my luck is
changing for the better every day. LOL.
IHC
>
> Dave,
>
> Big mistake mixing Anti-American and any type of anti-war or disagreeing
> with the bureacracy. If you want to get really pissed, check out the
front
> page article from the Wall Street Journal last Friday outlining where
> George Bush gets his foreign policy ideas from. Terrorists and Al Queda
> (sp?) are a minor part of the multicolumn article describing why Bush
wants
> this war. Support of Israel and further commercialization of the region
> are right on top of the list of motives. Give that to a soldier who is
> getting shot at and I think you would see one pissed off soldier.
>
> I am pissed off because I know that there are shreds of truth in the
> article. You read it yourself and if you don't get pissed off at Bush, you
> are going to be madder than hell at the Wall Street Journal for being "Un-
> American" as you say.
>
> IMO, this war is simply wrong. It is not in America's best interest.
Guys
> are getting captured and killed over there so Bush can play nation
builder.
> Since when have we been sucessful doing that? We put Saddam into power,
> now American blood is taking him out. I totally support the troops, the
> best thing we could have done was to never have entered this war and
> jeopardized so many people. The best thing we can do now is to make this
> quick and stabilize the region (if that is possible). The Iraqi's are
> playing guerilla warfare not unlike Vietnam. What did we expect, for them
> to line up to be shot? When we finally conquer or "liberate" the Iraqi's,
> is everyone going to drop their weapons and support the American's? Are
> you dreaming? So we conquer Iraq, don't we then have a whole bunch of
> pissed off armed Iraqi's under our "control". And this is going to help
us
> how? How many Americans will die from sniper fire, suicide bombers, etc.
> Occupation hasn't worked well with the Israelis over the Palestinians. Do
> we think we can do better?
>
> And who is next, North Korea? Didn't we fight a war with them before
also?
> Where exactly does this stop? Flame on, but I'm pissed that we are
losing
> American men and women to support Bush's agenda. I grew up with Vietnam
> body counts on TV and I didn't want to see this happen again.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:25:00 -0800, David Ball <vought@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > Steve It seems going over your posts of the last several months you bash
> > a
> > lot of things that are American the politicians, American history,
> > American
> > rights and laws Decorated Marine Vets following orders or even now
> > American
> > news.
> > You do not like America what's up with the Anti American slant. I hear
> > they
> > are looking for good history teachers in France.
> > Sorry for the non MV content but the American bashing is getting on my
> > nerves this is my country and I love it no matter its faults, It is the
> > best
> > damn country period.
> > And go Olie....
> >
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Grammont" <islander@midmaine.com>
> > To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MV] CNN quote of the day
> >
> >
> >> Ryan,
> >>
> >> I personally have found less useful information on CNN than in the
past.
> >> I started out watching CNN exclusively until I found myself sitting
> >> there listening to a lot of the same thing over and over and over
again.
> >> Generally with what I found to be very ill informed commentary. I then
> >> switched to MSNBC which I had never watched before. I have not
regreted
> >> that decision. I only switch to Fox when both aren't doing anything
> >> useful, and then only stay there if they aren't going off the wall
about
> >> something. Then I stumbled upon a Canadian/German based 24 hour news
> >> channel which I find infintely better (on the whole) than all three,
> >> provided I am not looking for live footage. I don't agree with the
> >> Canadian anti-war slant of some of their guests, but then again I don't
> >> see the US networks doing more than towing the party line for the most
> > part.
> >>
> >> In general, I am not impressed with the questions posed to military or
> >> administrative officials. I think I could have asked far more informed
> >> and meaningful questions when I was wet behind the ears Freshman in
> >> college. The net result is a missed opportunity to get real
information
> >> from our leaders instead of obvious answers to stupid questions.
> >>
> >> Just my opinion :-)
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> P.S. I wasn't slamming CNN for having a particular political slant.
> >> Just pointing out that if someone wants to accuse it of being
> >> "communist", well... I heard the exact opposite from Turner's son.
> >> Neither surprise me.
> >>
> >> >At 4:54 PM -0500 3/23/03, Steve Grammont wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>I think it should be a Crime Against Humanity to have reporters and
> >> >>(especially) anchors who don't have a friggin clue about military
ops,
> >> >>equipment, or historical perspective. I have seen so many MTV twitch
> >> >>questions ("why haven't we found this, done that, or seen this") than
> >> I
> >> >>care to think of.
> >> >
> >> >We've had Miles O'Brian on non stop over the week. The guy has to get
> >> >some sleep some times. Additionally, keep in mind that when you have
> >> >an anchor go on and start spouting details about the military, most
> >> >of the audience is going to say "huh?"
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>I also have stopped watching CNN. Their anchoring of this coverage
is
> >> >>horrible. I have been instead watching MSNBC and a newish 24hr cable
> >> >>news channel that pipes in news from non-US sources. Their coverage
> >> is
> >> >>in many ways superior and far more informative in general.
> >> >
> >> >Where'as Fox won't stop talking over the entire coverage of extremely
> >> >grave footage that speaks for itself.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list==To unsubscribe, send
> >> >e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> >> >To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-
> >> veh.org>
> >> >To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> >> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-
> >> veh.org>
> >> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >>
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:25:56 PDT