Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless

From: Paul A. Thomas (bluewhale@jaxkneppers.com)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 20:45:46 PST

Next message: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Previous message: Bill Kealey: "Re: [MV] Rebuild, or Not?"
Next in thread: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: International Movie Services: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Stephen & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Stephen & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Bobby Joe Pendleton: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Bobby Joe Pendleton: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: jonathon: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Amazing site! Truly a labor of love.
I enjoy this sort of site when I can find it: makes my to do's pale in
comparison.

Thanks Vernon

Paul

*******************************************

At 07:36 PM 1/16/2004, you wrote:
>While searching the web on the words "GMC 302 MILITARY NOS" I ran across
>
>http://www.futurliner.com
>
>I spent nearly an hour going through this awesomely large restoration. The
>site is a real tribute to enthusiasm and tenacity and the power of an
>organized group.
>
>It turns out the star of this show used the same engine and transmission as
>the Korean War era M135s.
>
>Hope somebody finds it of interest.
>
>VT
>
>
>
>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>

Next message: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Previous message: Bill Kealey: "Re: [MV] Rebuild, or Not?"
Next in thread: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: everette: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: International Movie Services: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Stephen & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Stephen & Jeanne Keith: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Bobby Joe Pendleton: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: chance wolf: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: Bobby Joe Pendleton: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Maybe reply: jonathon: "Re: [MV] Only tangentially MV related but interesting nonetheless"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:28:02 PDT