From: David Cole (DavidCole@tk7.net)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 12:26:24 PDT
Fox - real effort at the truth? Let's hope they keep trying. IMO - They
confuse truth with opinion. Can someone get further to the right than
Shawn Hanady? (sp?) I don't think so.
CNN - I think they are fairly unbiased - however everyone has some bias -
it's only human. Overall I think they do a fairly good job.
I watch CNN, read the paper ( locally very conservative ), local news
(totally confused - designed to fill the space between the commercials),
etc.
NRA, Rush, Drudge, etc and other radio heads - you get what you are looking
for - no one should confuse these "sources" with the "news".
Whatever your opinion, you can generally find what you are looking for if
you look long enough - and that may or may not be the truth.
Dave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 28 May 2004 10:43:10 -0400, Larry Tighe
<larryradio@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> The FOX news network seems to be making a real effort at truth. Maybe
> that's why their US ratings are higher than the other cable newsies
> combined! They use experienced news people (journalists) as opposed to
> pretty-boy teleprompter readers (presenters).
>
> Most large newspapers are owned by huge media groups (as are broadcast
> stations these days) and tint the news according to the editorial
> leanings.
>
> Lar
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Royce C Hayes" <rc_hayes1@juno.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [MV] Fw: Gun Ban
>
>
>> Best not to watch Clinton New Network, All 'Bout Clinton, Notin But
>> Clinton, and Clinton Broadcast System, typical liberal, say anything but
>> the truth, news networks.
>>
>> A lot of the local newspapers are also biased to the left. No truth
>> there either.
>>
>> When it comes to gun issues, it is best to get the news direct from the
>> NRA, a state affiliate, or a 2nd amendment list.
>>
>> I believe very little of what I hear through the liberal news media.
>>
>> Royce
>> ======================================
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 00:33:55 -0400 "Steve Grammont"
>> <islander@midmaine.com> writes:
>> >
>> >
>> > >There is some confusion here......
>> >
>> > yup, and sorry for being part of the reason for it.
>> >
>> .
>> >
>> > Thanks for the refresher. OK, so what is the connection to Bush
>> > Sr.? I
>> > could have sworn he had something to do with this law remaining in
>> > force.
>> > Same too for Bush Jr., who recently renewed SOME sort of ban within
>> > the
>> > last couple of weeks. Or at least he said he would (that was the
>> > report
>> > at the time I heard it). I heard that on CNN and at the time
>> > thought it
>> > was the '86 ban because it mentioned the legislation dated back to
>> > his
>> > father's time in office. Am I confusing this with something else?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Steve
>>
>> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-
>> veh.org>
>> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
-- Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:30:01 PDT