From: J (W7LS@blarg.net)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 13:02:57 PDT
Sean Hannity, Rush, and Drudge are just right to me. That was not the issue. The issue was "Where to get the straight facts about gun issues". You are not going to get it on the networks or CNN. Royce ================================= On Fri, 28 May 2004 14:26:24 -0500 David Cole <DavidCole@tk7.net> writes:Fox - real effort at the truth? Let's hope they keep trying. IMO - They confuse truth with opinion. Can someone get further to the right than Shawn Hanady? (sp?) I don't think so. CNN - I think they are fairly unbiased - however everyone has some bias - it's only human. Overall I think they do a fairly good job. I watch CNN, read the paper ( locally very conservative ), local news (totally confused - designed to fill the space between the commercials), etc. NRA, Rush, Drudge, etc and other radio heads - you get what you are looking for - no one should confuse these "sources" with the "news". Whatever your opinion, you can generally find what you are looking for if you look long enough - and that may or may not be the truth. DaveOn Fri, 28 May 2004 10:43:10 -0400, Larry Tighe <larryradio@worldnet.att.net> wrote:The FOX news network seems to be making a real effort at truth.Maybethat's why their US ratings are higher than the other cablenewsiescombined! They use experienced news people (journalists) asopposed topretty-boy teleprompter readers (presenters). Most large newspapers are owned by huge media groups (as arebroadcaststations these days) and tint the news according to the editorialleanings. Lar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Royce C Hayes"<rc_hayes1@juno.com>To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:30 AM Subject: Re: [MV] Fw: Gun BanBest not to watch Clinton New Network, All 'Bout Clinton, NotinButClinton, and Clinton Broadcast System, typical liberal, sayanything butthe truth, news networks. A lot of the local newspapers are also biased to the left. Notruththere either. When it comes to gun issues, it is best to get the news directfrom theNRA, a state affiliate, or a 2nd amendment list. I believe very little of what I hear through the liberal newsmedia.Royce ====================================== On Fri, 28 May 2004 00:33:55 -0400 "Steve Grammont" <islander@midmaine.com> writes:There is some confusion here......yup, and sorry for being part of the reason for it..Thanks for the refresher. OK, so what is the connection toBushSr.? I could have sworn he had something to do with this law remaininginforce. Same too for Bush Jr., who recently renewed SOME sort of banwithinthe last couple of weeks. Or at least he said he would (that wasthereport at the time I heard it). I heard that on CNN and at the time thought it was the '86 ban because it mentioned the legislation dated backtohis father's time in office. Am I confusing this with somethingelse?Thanks, Steve===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>-- Dave ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:30:01 PDT