From: Fred Martin (mung@in-touch.net)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 12:08:57 PDT
Heres some truth for you mister...theres a time to poke those keys and a
time to shut up! Yours seems to be mixed up. If you keep aggravating
this board...membership will drop an email to the moderator and have
your address blocked from using it. Theres your right to free speech! I
won't respond to anything else from you, please do likewise....I dislike
your attitude EXTREMELY! Go play under your truck! Fred Martin
Ida Heath wrote:
> Fred,
>
> I didn't realize I started an argument. Maybe in your spare time you could
> research that and address the one who did. I thought I only exercised my
> freedom of expression, sorry you didn't like the truth.
>
> On the fuel subject, I would agree on anything that would help a situation
> but if they did what you mentioned I'm just wondering where the vehicles got
> their fuel from out on the road? Maybe they were a local outfit and had
> their fuel in their own tanks.
>
> Sonny
> PPPPPPP
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fred Martin <mung@in-touch.net>
> To: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] MV Posts
>
>
>
>>Okay Ken...let me try.
>>
>>I just read an older (1999) article in a magazine about the fact that if
>>Caterpillar Tractor Co. has their way we will convert from diesel fuel
>>to a cleaner burning natural gas engine. They say further that they have
>>begun to manufacture kits to convert their C-10 or C-12 tractor trailer
>>engines to liquified natural gas. The cleaner burning fuel is 90%
>>natural gas and 10% diesel. One company that has already converted says
>>that it no longer (annually)puts 74,000 pounds of particulate in the
>>air...(60+ trucks)...the article goes on to say that the company has
>>reduced fuel costs and has 25% longer engine life. Now, has anyone heard
>>anything lately about this old technology? And if so, is there still
>>savings between the diesel and natural gas. Inquiring minds want to
>>know...the 25% part sounds like a plus...and the subject matter on the
>>board needs to roll over.
>>
>>PS Sonny...if you're gonna start an argument on this post...please
>>don't respond to it...thanks. Fred Martin
>>
>>
>>Recovry4x4@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>Will somebody wake me up when we start posting about Military Vehicles
>>
> again?
>
>>>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>>>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
>>
> <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>
>>>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>>>
>>
>>
>>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:33:50 PDT