Re: [MV] MV Posts

From: Ida Heath (spike@defuniak.com)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:03:48 PDT


Now I know I have you as mad as a wet sitting hen BUT I don't know why you
are mad as I have only posted to this list pretty much the same way as you
and many other folks have. I have not, that I remember, called anyone an
"old fart" like one did me and I have not said "Bite me" like one did me,
rather I have tried to respond with respect but I certainly have not
received it from about three or four of you. Most people have, I'm sure,
just deleted the controversial posts and hope that it dies down, just like
I'am trying to do now. I came back and apologized to the list for a post I
made in anger concerning our inability to be able to live in harmony and
peace with the Muslim people. I thought that was the right thing to do.
I'am wondering if maybe those of you who are on my case are doing it because
you know that I'am a Chief Warrant Officer, you once had to work under one
and this is your chance to "Get Me" If thats the case then you got what you
wanted, you told me off, if not then I don't know what it is.

I will say this and shut up though, I feel bad that the posts from three or
four people are causing hard feelings to many more who certainly don't
deserve it. I feel bad for any offense that I have caused even though I'm
really not sure what I have done that is bad enough to get all these hateful
posts. It would please me to be able to explain my postings to any
moderator. This should not be a one sided thing, you shouldn't get to say
what you want and tell me to shut up, I should have the same rights on this
forum as you.

Sonny

----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Martin <mung@in-touch.net>
To: Ida Heath <spike@defuniak.com>
Cc: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] MV Posts

> Heres some truth for you mister...theres a time to poke those keys and a
> time to shut up! Yours seems to be mixed up. If you keep aggravating
> this board...membership will drop an email to the moderator and have
> your address blocked from using it. Theres your right to free speech! I
> won't respond to anything else from you, please do likewise....I dislike
> your attitude EXTREMELY! Go play under your truck! Fred Martin
>
> Ida Heath wrote:
> > Fred,
> >
> > I didn't realize I started an argument. Maybe in your spare time you
could
> > research that and address the one who did. I thought I only exercised
my
> > freedom of expression, sorry you didn't like the truth.
> >
> > On the fuel subject, I would agree on anything that would help a
situation
> > but if they did what you mentioned I'm just wondering where the vehicles
got
> > their fuel from out on the road? Maybe they were a local outfit and had
> > their fuel in their own tanks.
> >
> > Sonny
> > PPPPPPP
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Fred Martin <mung@in-touch.net>
> > To: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MV] MV Posts
> >
> >
> >
> >>Okay Ken...let me try.
> >>
> >>I just read an older (1999) article in a magazine about the fact that if
> >>Caterpillar Tractor Co. has their way we will convert from diesel fuel
> >>to a cleaner burning natural gas engine. They say further that they have
> >>begun to manufacture kits to convert their C-10 or C-12 tractor trailer
> >>engines to liquified natural gas. The cleaner burning fuel is 90%
> >>natural gas and 10% diesel. One company that has already converted says
> >>that it no longer (annually)puts 74,000 pounds of particulate in the
> >>air...(60+ trucks)...the article goes on to say that the company has
> >>reduced fuel costs and has 25% longer engine life. Now, has anyone heard
> >>anything lately about this old technology? And if so, is there still
> >>savings between the diesel and natural gas. Inquiring minds want to
> >>know...the 25% part sounds like a plus...and the subject matter on the
> >>board needs to roll over.
> >>
> >>PS Sonny...if you're gonna start an argument on this post...please
> >>don't respond to it...thanks. Fred Martin
> >>
> >>
> >>Recovry4x4@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>Will somebody wake me up when we start posting about Military Vehicles
> >>
> > again?
> >
> >>>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> >>>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> >>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
> >>
> > <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> >
> >>>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> >>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> >>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:33:50 PDT