Re: [MV] My recent run in with the Commercial Vehicle Police - Indiana

From: timothy.smith1@att.net
Date: Thu Jun 09 2005 - 20:36:57 PDT

• Next message: James Shanks: "Re: [MV] Cummins run away"
• Previous message: flyn3nvt@adelphia.net: "Re: [MV] Cummins run away"
• Maybe in reply to: joeyounginc@aol.com: "[MV] My recent run in with the Commercial Vehicle Police - Indiana"
• Next in thread: Bjorn Brandstedt: "Re: [MV] My recent run in with the Commercial Vehicle Police - Indiana"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dave,

> Tim, regarding the permits required for interstate travel - are those
> widely disregarded in certain areas. In other words, is that a common
> violation?

Not common. You call them "permits"...are you speaking of interstate operating authority, multi-state apportioned registration or what? You can also be put out of service without the required operating authority

> I can see some good reasons to go with LED turn signal units now. Being
> out of service due to a burnt out light bulb burn stinks.

A cautionary note about retrofitting with LED's...make sure you still have reflectors in place after you do this...come old light assemblies incorporate the required reflector in the lens and when guys replace them with LED's...guess what..no reflectors!

Regards,
TJ

• Next message: James Shanks: "Re: [MV] Cummins run away"
• Previous message: flyn3nvt@adelphia.net: "Re: [MV] Cummins run away"
• Maybe in reply to: joeyounginc@aol.com: "[MV] My recent run in with the Commercial Vehicle Police - Indiana"
• Next in thread: Bjorn Brandstedt: "Re: [MV] My recent run in with the Commercial Vehicle Police - Indiana"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 22:47:28 PDT