Re: GL 1691

From: jatonka (jatonka@telenet.net)
Date: Thu Dec 29 2005 - 16:45:54 PST


It was OK for DRMS to publish all bidder's names and adresses with their
bidder number. That wasn't collusion. I would like to know who I am bidding
against, that isn't collusion either. I will be happy to share my # with
others who will share theirs. John Tennis
----- Original Message -----
From: <Recovry4x4@aol.com>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] GL 1691

> Sadly the playing field is not fair! While GLS hides the bidders
> identity
> for some reason, when we try to figure out a way to even the playing
> field,
> its called collusion. I have no proof of GLS shilling bids, the evidence
> is
> painfully obvious although circumstantial. If the folks at GLS wanted to
> even
> the playing field, they would disclose the bidders identitiy just like
> DRMS
> did. This is what happens when you run a monopoly. Oh well!
>
> In a message dated 12/29/2005 3:19:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> flmv@flmv.net writes:
> This would be COLLUSION you are trying to commit!!!! Not something you
> want
> to do. Ask any of the big players caught up in the last go round over it
> a
> few years ago.
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
> Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:37:28 PDT