From: Dennis Deck (ddeck@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 08:17:46 PST
Why not put a triangle on the back and put a sign farm
vehicle on the side. It should work until some
officers sites you for driving a vehicle without a
license. Then you can take the citation and demand a
license or a voiding of the citation.
Dennis
--- G Shaw <milspectruck@verizon.net> wrote:
> Exactly. And if it
> loses........................what will the other
> states
> say then? Especially places like MA, NJ, NY, CA
> etc. You have made my
> point. Is this the place and TIME to draw the line
> in the sand with regard
> to private parties running aroung on the road with
> Armor? Right now most of
> these states allow a Halftrack as it is.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Glenn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: froberts@midsouth.rr.com
> [mailto:froberts@midsouth.rr.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:06 AM
> To: G Shaw
> Cc: Military Vehicles Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [MV] [Fwd: [inmvpa] i need your help,
> please]
>
>
> The MVPA better that a stand NOW. After the 1st one
> does any other
> state, or anybody who wants another state to do it
> will say "Kanas is
> already doing it".
>
>
>
> Robertson Sniper Restorations Webpage Link
>
> http://home.midsouth.rr.com/w2sniper
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: G Shaw <milspectruck@verizon.net>
> Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:57 am
> Subject: Re: [MV] [Fwd: [inmvpa] i need your help,
> please]
>
> > Hey guys, just a step back from the issue for a
> second;
> >
> > Beware that this is fraud both with your
> registration and your
> > insurance and
> > has MANY pitfalls. You must have a verifiable
> garaged address for
> the
> > insurance companies as well as the taxes. PO
> Boxes are
> > unacceptable except
> > as a business mailing address. I would be wary of
> committing all
> > kinds of
> > felonies and misdemeanors in a vain effort to get
> around the
> > primary issue.
> > This will do everyone a lot more harm than good.
> Does the state
> > of Kansas
> > have right to not certify a certain type of
> vehicle for everyday
> > road use??
> > This has already been decided many times in the
> courts. It is a
> > priviledge,not a right to use a vehicle on the
> road as the state
> > may see fit. And the
> > state will execute their power and defend it in
> the courts.
> >
> > If you look at the argument raised by the Ferret
> owner pretty much
> > everyclause is quite weak in its legal standing.
> Although we may
> > not like the
> > outcome, Kansas has many different solid
> arguments that they may
> > use in
> > court (and will) to support their refusal to issue
> the priviledge
> > of driving
> > this armored military vehicle on the public way.
> Safety issues
> > specific to
> > the vehicles odd seating, non standard steering
> controls, limited
> > visibilityand the safety of other travelers near
> it on the highway
> > , along with the
> > ever present public policy issues to do with
> Private Armor in this
> > day and
> > age of Terrorist threats. Does anyone else see
> the day coming
> > when Private
> > Armor will reside only in collections or be
> trucked out to a
> > parade or show
> > on a flatbed? I see it as a real possibility the
> way things are
> > going. You
> > will find that support for the owners of this
> Armor being able to
> > be owned
> > at all or driven on the highway, with the general
> public, is about
> > as great
> > as for anyone being able to walk around with a sub
> machine gun at
> > the mall.
> > We have to face up to what the reality of this is
> today. People
> > are afraid
> > out there.
> >
> > Does the MVPA "want" to make a stand on this issue
> here and now?
> > I don't
> > know. It may have as much downside as up to make
> a big stink of
> > this in the
> > Public Forum. If the case is lost it will become a
> far more
> widespread
> > policy in many more states. Maybe discretion
> would be the better
> > part of
> > valor on this at this time. Perhaps this guy can
> just move on to
> > anothertype of MV and have some fun instead of
> giving himself a
> > lot of trouble all
> > the way around. It is certain that the legal
> costs where this is
> > headingare going to be FAR more than the Ferret
> cost in the first
> > place. I was not
> > going to post anything on this, but I think that
> everyone should
> > take a look
> > at the long view of the big picture without
> emotion before flying
> > off on
> > this. It will end up being argued by legal pros
> far better than I
> > soonenough if it keeps moving up the docket as
> they say. We shall
> > see.
> > Glenn
> > MTA
> > MVPA
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Military Vehicles Mailing List
> [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org]
> > On Behalf
> > Of MV
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:01 AM
> > To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [MV] [Fwd: [inmvpa] i need your help,
> please]
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have any experience in doing this?
> Particulary
> > between
> > Indiana and Michigan or Ohio or Illinois?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > laptops wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Maguire"
> > <dmaguire@mchsi.com>> To: "Military Vehicles
> Mailing List" <mil-
> > veh@mil-veh.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:14 PM
> > > Subject: [MV] [Fwd: [inmvpa] i need your help,
> please]
> > >
> > > Here is what I would do.Go to Illinois and get a
> pobx and get
> > Illonois> Plates and tell Kanas where to stick it
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > > To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
> > > Visit the searchable archives at
> http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
> > >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>
=== message truncated ===
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:39:23 PDT