From: Arthur Bloom (m35prod@optonline.net)
Date: Tue Feb 21 2006 - 13:28:49 PST
How about "enclosed, bladeless bulldozer"?
apb
----- Original Message -----
| Feb 21 2006
From: "The Alamo" <thealamo@igb.cnr.it>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:49 AM
Subject: [MV] Ferret/Kansas Affair
|
| Just received the March issue of the British magazine CLASSIC MILITARY
| VEHICLES. On pag. 11 under "HOT NEWS" heading there is
|
| "As we go to press we learn that the US state of Kansas has attempted to
| outlaw the private ownership of armoured vehicles by making it impossible
| for them to be licensed for road use.
| And there is no reason for non-Kansas dwellers to feel smug. As US
| abolitionist and orator Wendell Phillips didn't quite say, 'the price of
| liberty is eternal vigilance' and there but for the grace of God...
| Watch this space for more news as it unfolds".
|
| I have not yet received SUPPLY LINE nor ARMY MOTORS: does anybody know if
| any of the above two magazines contains info/news on the "Kansas/Ferret
| Affair"??? Just curious...
|
| May I take this opportunity to remind the Green machines confraternity to
| NOT use "armored vehicles"??? Please, say "Historical Military Vehicles"
| or better "Historical former Military Vehicles"!! Thank you!!
|
| Regards,
| Raimondo
| 1943 GPW Jeep
|
|
|
| ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
| To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
| To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
| Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:41:05 PDT