From: The Alamo (thealamo@igb.cnr.it)
Date: Wed Feb 22 2006 - 02:24:58 PST
At 22.28 21/02/2006, ARTHUR wrote:
>Sender: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>Precedence: list
>Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:28:49 -0500
>From: Arthur Bloom <m35prod@optonline.net>
>Subject: Re: [MV] Ferret/Kansas Affair
>
>How about "enclosed, bladeless bulldozer"?
>
>apb
Feb 22 2006
Arthur,
Not bad!! I like it!!
Regards,
Raimondo
1943 GPW Jeep
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "The Alamo" <thealamo@igb.cnr.it>
>To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:49 AM
>Subject: [MV] Ferret/Kansas Affair
>
>
>| Feb 21 2006
>|
>| Just received the March issue of the British magazine CLASSIC MILITARY
>| VEHICLES. On pag. 11 under "HOT NEWS" heading there is
>|
>| "As we go to press we learn that the US state of Kansas has attempted to
>| outlaw the private ownership of armoured vehicles by making it impossible
>| for them to be licensed for road use.
>| And there is no reason for non-Kansas dwellers to feel smug. As US
>| abolitionist and orator Wendell Phillips didn't quite say, 'the price of
>| liberty is eternal vigilance' and there but for the grace of God...
>| Watch this space for more news as it unfolds".
>|
>| I have not yet received SUPPLY LINE nor ARMY MOTORS: does anybody know if
>| any of the above two magazines contains info/news on the "Kansas/Ferret
>| Affair"??? Just curious...
>|
>| May I take this opportunity to remind the Green machines confraternity to
>| NOT use "armored vehicles"??? Please, say "Historical Military Vehicles"
>| or better "Historical former Military Vehicles"!! Thank you!!
>|
>| Regards,
>| Raimondo
>| 1943 GPW Jeep
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:41:06 PDT